Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for NEW ROTIKAA MADE IN AMERICA FOR HEALTHY LIVING & HOMEMADE TASTE BIG 25 PIECES FRESH HOMEMADE TASTE! FRESH TAWA ROTI NO ARTIFICIAL COLORS, FLAVORS OR PRESERVATIVES NO ARTIFICIAL COLORS · FLAVORS · PRESERVATIVES ALWAYS FRESH NEW ROTIKAA, serial 90053541, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
NEW ROTIKAA MADE IN AMERICA FOR HEALTHY LIVING & HOMEMADE TASTE BIG 25 PIECES FRESH HOMEMADE TASTE! FRESH TAWA ROTI NO ARTIFICIAL COLORS, FLAVORS OR PRESERVATIVES NO ARTIFICIAL COLORS · FLAVORS · PRESERVATIVES ALWAYS FRESH NEW ROTIKAASerial 90053541 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: New Rotikaa Foods, LLC
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Filed Jul 15, 2020
Registered Mar 29, 2022
The record shows a live, Principal Register registration (Reg. No. 6681946) owned by New Rotikaa Foods, LLC, a New Jersey limited‑liability company, and it covers staple‑food items specifically “roti bread; multigrain roti bread; whole wheat roti bread” in International Class 030. Because the listed goods are food products, a similar name used for any kind of roti or related bread would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated categories such as clothing or software would be farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “NEW ROTI‑KAA” or the descriptive phrases in the disclaimer; it only protects the exact combination as applied to the listed foods. The most recent meaningful event is the registration date of March 29 2022, and the prosecution history shows a final refusal in June 2021 that was overcome before the mark entered the Principal Register—no supplemental‑register language appears. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market a similar roti product under a comparable name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.