Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for FULL PULL BEEPERS WWW.FACEBOOK.COM/FULLPULLBEEPERS, serial 90055282, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FULL PULL BEEPERS WWW.FACEBOOK.COM/FULLPULLBEEPERS
Serial 90055282 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused

Owner: Davis, Dever D
Class 028 -
Filed Jul 15, 2020

The record shows that the mark “FULL PULL BEEPERS WWW.FACEBOOK.COM/FULLPULLBEEPERS” is dead because the applicant, Davis, Dever D of a South Carolina limited liability company, failed to respond to an office action. The mark was filed on July 15 2020 and abandoned on May 17 2021. It was registered on the Principal Register for goods in class 028, specifically a fish bite alarm and strike indicator first used in commerce on July 31 2018. The abandonment means the owner no longer holds enforceable rights, but the record still indicates that the wording was once protected for that particular product. Because the mark was on the Principal Register, the prosecution history shows a normal examination sequence with a non‑final action and eventual abandonment; no Supplemental Register steps are involved. No opposition, cancellation, or court action appears in the supplied history, so there is no visible enforcement signal. For someone considering a similar name, the closest concern would be using the same wording for a fish bite alarm or related device, but the abandonment suggests the risk is lower, though the mark’s prior protection remains a potential point of caution.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search