Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for MADMAN PONDO; MAD MAN PONDO, serial 90103482, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
MADMAN PONDO; MAD MAN PONDOSerial 90103482 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Canady, Kevin
Class 038 - Communication Services
Filed
The record shows that the mark “MADMAN PONDO; MAD MAN PONDO” is dead and was refused because the application did not meet minimum filing date requirements; the serial number was assigned in error. The owner listed is Kevin Canady, an individual. The only goods or services listed are “I use Madman Pondo as my wrestling name,” which falls under class 038, Communication Services. Because the mark is not registered and the application was dismissed, the record does not give the owner control over the wording in any broader sense. The prosecution history shows a single office action on September 10, 2020, after the application was entered on August 13, 2020, with no further examination or amendment. No enforcement activity such as oppositions or cancellations appears in the supplied history. For someone looking to use a similar name, the closest concern would be in the wrestling or entertainment communication space, but the record does not indicate that the owner has any enforceable rights beyond this specific, now‑dead application.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.