Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for A CIRCULAR MALE HUMAN FACE, LIKE A CIRCULAR FACE THAT GOES ON TOP OF A "HUMAN" STICK OR "HUMAN" FOAM FIGURE. THE CIRCULAR MALE FACE HAS MALE HUMAN LIKE (NOT CARTOONISH LOOKING) EYES, EYELASHES AND EYEBROWS. THE PERIMETER OF THE CIRCLE IS OUTLINED WITH CIRCULAR SHAPED RHINESTONE/CIRCULAR SHAPED PAINT (USING TWO EXAMPLES FOR A VISUAL) THAT DOES NOT PROTRUDE OFF OF THE CIRCLE. EACH CIRCULAR SHAPED RHINESTONE/CIRCULAR SHAPED PAINT IS A DIFFERENT COLOR OF THE RAINBOW. THE CIRCULAR RHINESTONE/CIRCULAR PAINT RAINBOW OUTLINE IS LIKE A HALO, EXCEPT IT IS NOT AS LARGE. THE CIRCULAR RAINBOW OUTLINE STAYS ON/IS ON THE PERIMETER OF THE CIRCULAR SHAPE. JUST BELOW THE EYES, A MASK GOES STRAIGHT ACROSS THE FACE AND ALL THE WAY TO THE BOTTOM OF THE CIRCLE. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO EARS, THE MASK DOES NOT HAVE STRAPS. THE MASK STAYS WITHIN THE CIRCULAR RAINBOW COLORED RHINESTONES/CIRCULAR RAINBOW PAINT OF THE CIRCULAR FACE. YOU CANNOT SEE A NOSE OR MOUTH. TBERE IS NO HAIR., serial 90137382, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
Trademark Status Report
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Serial 90137382 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: JOANIE BABY!, L.L.C.
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed
The record shows that the mark is dead; the application was void because it did not meet minimum filing date requirements, and the serial number was assigned in error. The owner listed is Joanie Baby!, L.L.C., a limited liability company organized in Louisiana. The mark covered custom paintings and graphic T‑shirts under classes 016 and 025, with first use in August 2020. Because the mark is dead, it does not give the owner control over the wording in any other context. The prosecution history shows only the initial filing and assignment to an examiner; no further examination or refusal is recorded. There are no oppositions, cancellations, or court actions in the supplied history, so the record shows no visible enforcement activity. For someone considering a similar name, the closest concern would be in the same classes of custom artwork and apparel; outside those goods, the risk is farther from the specific scope shown.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.