Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for I'M WITH THE BAND BY PAMELA DES BARRES, serial 90233045, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
I'M WITH THE BAND BY PAMELA DES BARRESSerial 90233045 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Essene Community Life Church
Class 001 -
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Class 029 - Meats & Processed Foods
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Class 031 -
Class 032 - Light Beverages
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Oct 02, 2020
The record shows the application for “I’M WITH THE BAND BY PAMELA DES BARRES” is dead, having been abandoned on September 30 2021 after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, and the owner listed is Essene Community Life Church, an unincorporated association in California. The filing covered a very broad set of goods, most notably enzyme preparations for food, alcohol, detergent and functional‑food industries, as well as a range of fermented foods, dressings, yeasts, vegetable and fruit juices, and various online services related to publishing, website design and charitable fundraising. Because the listed goods focus on food‑related enzyme and fermented products and related online services, a similar name used for those categories would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated fields would be farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the wording. The prosecution history shows the application moved from filing in October 2020 to an examiner assignment in February 2021, a non‑final action in March 2021, and then abandonment in September 2021; no later maintenance or renewal dates are provided. The supplied history contains no visible enforcement actions such as oppositions or cancellations. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use the same wording for enzyme‑related foods or the listed online services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.