Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for V, serial 90321592, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
VSerial 90321592 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Bloidei Dorzon
Class 007 -
Class 008 -
Class 011 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 021 -
Class 029 - Meats & Processed Foods
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Class 031 -
Class 033 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Filed Nov 16, 2020
The record shows the mark V is dead – it was abandoned on September 28 2021 after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, and the owner listed is Bloidei Dorzon. The application covered a very broad range of kitchen‑related items, from electric pepper‑mill sets and mixers in class 007 to non‑electric cutlery, cookware and kitchen tools in classes 008, 011, 021 and many food‑product categories in classes 029, 030, 031 and 033, as well as related retail, charitable, entertainment and educational services. Because the filing was for those specific goods and services, a similar single‑letter name used on comparable kitchen appliances or food‑related products would be the closest area of concern, but the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the letter V in other contexts. The prosecution history shows the application was assigned to an examiner in early 2021, received a non‑final action, and then was abandoned after a missed response; there are no entries indicating oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a mark that overlaps the listed kitchen and food categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.