Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for V VICTORY, serial 90321673, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
V VICTORYSerial 90321673 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Bloidei Dorzon
Class 007 -
Class 008 -
Class 011 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 021 -
Class 029 - Meats & Processed Foods
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Class 031 -
Class 033 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Filed Nov 16, 2020
The record shows that “V VICTORY” is a dead application that was abandoned on September 28 2021 because the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, and the owner listed is Bloidei Dorzon; it never reached registration on either the Principal or Supplemental Register. The filing covered a very broad range of kitchen‑related items, including electric peppermills, mixers, blenders, knives, cookware, cookbooks, prepared foods, beverages, and related retail and entertainment services, so a similar name used for any of those goods or services would create the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “V VICTORY” in other fields. The prosecution history shows only the filing, a series of office communications, and the final abandonment notice, with no oppositions, cancellations or court actions visible. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a similar name for cooking equipment or food‑related products, because the abandoned application still signals a prior claim in that area.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.