Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for G-WILL, serial 90431566, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
G-WILLSerial 90431566 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: YUEQING G WILL INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.
Class 007 -
Class 012 -
Class 022 -
Filed Dec 30, 2020
Registered Oct 19, 2021
The record shows that “G‑WILL” is a live, registered mark on the Principal Register owned by YUEQING G WILL INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., a limited company organized in China. The mark protects a range of automotive parts—dynamos, air filters, bearings, belts, carburetors, connecting rods, cooling radiators, cylinder heads, fuel filters, hydraulic pumps, ignition coils, machine parts such as bearings and bushings, oil filters, oil pumps, pistons, shaft couplings, shock absorbers, starters, and water pumps for land vehicles—as well as a variety of vehicle chassis, door handles, tyres, brake components, safety seats, clutches, gear boxes, inner tubes, luggage carriers, rearview mirrors, suspension parts, and wheel hubs. A similar name used for these or closely related automotive components would raise the closest record‑based concern. The record does not grant control over every use of the wording, only over the goods listed. The prosecution history shows the mark was approved for publication and registered on October 19, 2021, with no opposition or enforcement events recorded. The next significant date would be the maintenance filing deadline, but it is not supplied here. For anyone considering a similar name in these automotive parts, the record suggests a meaningful risk of conflict.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.