Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FISH N' SPIN, serial 90486041, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FISH N' SPINSerial 90486041 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Playtika UK-House of Fun Limited
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Jan 25, 2021
Registered Feb 08, 2022
The record shows that “FISH N’ SPIN” is a live Principal Register service mark owned by Playtika UK‑House of Fun Limited, a private limited company organized in the United Kingdom, and it has been registered since February 8 2022. The registration covers education and entertainment services in International Class 041, specifically online computer games, game‑related enhancements, an internet website portal for computer games, and virtual environments where users interact through social games for recreational or leisure purposes. A similar name used for anything that falls within those online gaming or virtual‑social‑game services would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside that digital‑gaming sphere are farther from the listed scope but not automatically free of risk. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Fish” or “Spin.” The latest meaningful status event is the registration on February 8 2022; the prosecution history shows routine correspondence updates in late 2025 but no oppositions, cancellations or court actions. Because the mark is active for online gaming services, I’d treat a comparable name in that same space as a meaningful concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.