Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for F FLORES, serial 90494347, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
F FLORESSerial 90494347 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Flores & Associates, LLC
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Filed Jan 28, 2021
Registered Feb 21, 2023
The record shows that “F FLORES” is a live, registered Principal Register service mark owned by Flores & Associates, LLC, a Delaware limited‑liability company, and it was officially entered on the register on Feb 21 2023 after publication for opposition on Dec 6 2022. The registration covers only one class – Class 036 – specifically “Administration of employee benefit, tax‑advantaged, reimbursement, and billing plans concerning insurance and finance,” with a first use date of Aug 27 2018. Because the protection is limited to those insurance‑ and finance‑related services, a similar name used in a different field (for example, retail, technology or hospitality) would be farther from the scope shown here, while a name used for comparable employee‑benefit or billing services would present the closest record‑based concern. The prosecution history shows a final refusal in Mar 2022 that was later overcome, leading to registration on the Principal Register; it does not imply any broader control over the words themselves. The most recent status event is the registration confirmation on Feb 21 2023, and the supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a mark in the same employee‑benefit or financial‑administration space, but the record does not block unrelated uses of the wording.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.