Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ONEPLUS BAND, serial 90619067, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ONEPLUS BANDSerial 90619067 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Apr 01, 2021
Registered Feb 21, 2023
The record shows that ONEPLUS BAND is a live, Principal Register trademark owned by OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., and it was registered on Feb 21 2023 after publication for opposition on Dec 6 2022. The registration covers Class 009 goods such as smartphones, smartwatches, tablet computers, USB cables, power adapters, smartglasses, pedometers, body‑fat scales, cases for smartphones, electronic access‑control systems, laser level measuring apparatus, distance‑measuring devices, protective films for smartphones, downloadable game software and wireless routers. Because the listed goods focus on electronic and scientific apparatus, a similar name used on comparable devices would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated fields would be farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “ONEPLUS” or “BAND.” No supplemental‑register filing appears, and the prosecution history simply reflects the normal examination steps leading to registration. The latest meaningful status event is the notice of registration confirmation emailed on Feb 21 2023, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a mark for similar electronic products.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.