Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ONEPLUS BULLETS WIRELESS, serial 90619120, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ONEPLUS BULLETS WIRELESSSerial 90619120 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Apr 01, 2021
Registered Apr 18, 2023
The record shows that “ONEPLUS BULLETS WIRELESS” is a live, Principal Register registration owned by OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited company, and it has been active since its registration on April 18 2023. The registration covers a range of electronic and scientific apparatus in International Class 009, specifically items such as smartphones, smartwatches, earphones, wireless routers, USB cables for cellphones, power adapters, tablet computers, smartglasses, pedometers, body‑fat scales, protective films for smartphones, laser level measuring devices, electronic access control systems, distance‑measuring apparatus, and downloadable mobile‑phone game software. A similar name used for any of those types of products would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside that list fall farther from the scope shown here, though the record does not control every possible use of the words “ONEPLUS,” “BULLETS,” or “WIRELESS.” The latest meaningful event is the registration date of April 18 2023; no further maintenance or renewal dates are provided. The prosecution history is empty, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations, or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a mark that overlaps the listed electronic goods.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.