Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ONEPLUS WATCH, serial 90619199, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ONEPLUS WATCHSerial 90619199 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Apr 01, 2021
Registered Feb 21, 2023
The record shows that ONEPLUS WATCH is a live, Principal Register trademark owned by OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., a limited company organized in China, and it was registered on February 21 2023 after filing on April 1 2021. The registration covers Class 009 goods such as smartwatches, smartphones, tablet computers, USB cables, power adapters, pedometers, smartglasses, body‑fat scales, cases for smartphones, data‑processing and distance‑measuring apparatus, electronic access‑control systems, laser level devices, protective films, wireless routers and downloadable game software. Because the listed goods focus on electronic and scientific apparatus, a similar name used for those types of products would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated fields would be farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “ONEPLUS” or “WATCH.” The latest meaningful event is the Notice of Registration Confirmation emailed on February 21 2023, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a mark for comparable electronic devices.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.