Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ONEPLUS LIFE, serial 90621979, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ONEPLUS LIFESerial 90621979 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Apr 02, 2021
Registered Jun 27, 2023
The record shows a live, Principal Register registration for “ONEPLUS LIFE” owned by OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., filed on April 2 2021 and registered on June 27 2023; the most recent status event is the registration‑confirmation notice emailed on that same date. The goods and services are listed in International Class 042 and focus on scientific and technology services such as cartography, computer software design for mobile phone operating systems and apps that handle personal‑lifestyle tracking, weather, entertainment and social networking, cloud‑computing consulting, dress designing, electronic data storage, industrial design, material testing, internet search‑engine provision, research‑and‑development for others, and software updates for mobile platforms. A similar name would raise the closest concern in these tech‑related areas, but the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “ONEPLUS” or “LIFE.” The prosecution history shows a smooth path to registration with no oppositions or cancellations, and the supplied history contains no visible enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a mark that touches the same tech services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.