Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ONEPLUS, serial 90624448, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ONEPLUSSerial 90624448 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
Class 011 -
Filed Apr 05, 2021
Registered Jan 21, 2025
The record shows a live, Principal Register registration (Reg. No. 7656879) owned by OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited company, and it was officially registered on Jan 21 2025 after publication for opposition on Dec 3 2024. The protection is limited to the Class 011 goods listed as “Bath installations; Cooking ovens; Cooking stoves; Electric pocket warmers for warming hands; Heating installations; Refrigerating machines and installations; Water purification installations; all of the aforementioned goods are not related to lights and electric fans.” A similar name used for any of those appliances or related installations would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside that narrow scope fall farther from the listed area but are not automatically free of risk. The prosecution history shows the application proceeded through examination, a notice of allowance was cancelled, a basis change petition was granted, and the mark ultimately entered the Principal Register; it is not on the Supplemental Register. The most recent meaningful event is the notice of registration confirmation emailed on Jan 21 2025, and no enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to brand similar household or heating equipment under the same word.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.