Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ONEPLUS NORD, serial 90624605, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ONEPLUS NORDSerial 90624605 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
Class 021 -
Filed Apr 05, 2021
Registered Jan 16, 2024
The record shows that ONEPLUS NORD is a live, Principal Register trademark owned by OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., and it was registered on January 16 2024 after filing on April 5 2021. The registration covers Class 021 goods such as kitchen containers, glass boxes, porcelain mugs, china ornaments, tea‑service tableware, cosmetic brushes, toothbrushes, non‑woven cosmetic wipes, droppers, spatulas, applicator wands, heat‑insulated household containers, non‑electric carpet sweepers and other household containers. A similar name used for any of those items would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated categories fall farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “ONEPLUS NORD.” The most recent substantive event is the registration confirmation notice dated January 16 2024; no later maintenance or renewal dates are listed. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement signals. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to brand similar household or cosmetic products under a comparable name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.