Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ONEPLUS NORD, serial 90624620, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ONEPLUS NORDSerial 90624620 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
Class 028 -
Filed Apr 05, 2021
Registered Feb 18, 2025
The record shows that ONEPLUS NORD is a live, Principal Register trademark owned by OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., and it was officially registered on February 18 2025 after the usual examination steps, including a petition to change the filing basis and a final allowance. The registration covers Class 028 goods such as archery implements, body‑building apparatus, synthetic Christmas trees, game‑console controllers, playing cards, portable LCD games, fishing rods, sport balls and toy vehicles, so a similar name used on any of those items would raise the closest record‑based concern. The USPTO filing does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “ONEPLUS” or “NORD” outside those listed categories. The most recent status event is the notice of registration confirmation emailed on February 18 2025; no further dates are provided. The prosecution history contains no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions, so the supplied history shows no visible enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a comparable name for similar sporting or gaming products.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.