Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PETALS, serial 90669049, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PETALSSerial 90669049 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Seeding Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Filed Apr 24, 2021
The record shows that the mark “PETALS” is dead and was abandoned by its owner, Seeding Inc., a Delaware corporation, because the applicant failed to respond to an Office action. The mark was filed on April 24 2021 under an intent‑to‑use basis and was listed on the Principal Register. The goods and services it covered are extensive, ranging from specimen collection kits and wellness testing kits in microbiology, fertility, pregnancy, childbirth, and early childhood development to a wide array of software, database, educational, and medical services in the same fields. A similar name would raise the closest concern in those health‑science and wellness areas, especially where specimen collection or wellness testing is involved. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “PETALS.” No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. The last meaningful event was the abandonment notice on July 6 2022. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status reduces the risk, but the extensive goods and services list still signals a potential concern in related health‑science and wellness markets.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.