Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for LA BRI OSH, serial 90758533, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
LA BRI OSHSerial 90758533 · Supplemental Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Mesada International Trading Inc.
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Filed Jun 07, 2021
The record shows that the mark “LA BRI OSH” is dead, having been abandoned because the applicant failed to respond to an Office action. The owner listed is Mesada International Trading Inc., a corporation organized in New York. The mark was filed on June 7, 2021 and was abandoned on March 12, 2023. It was registered on the Supplemental Register for class 030, covering staple foods such as bakery products, bread, brioche, bread sticks, rolls, pull‑apart loaves, croissants, and buns. Because the mark is on the Supplemental Register, the prosecution history indicates a non‑final action and a refusal for descriptiveness that was not overcome; the applicant did not amend to the Principal Register. No opposition, cancellation, or court action appears in the supplied history, so there is no visible enforcement activity. A similar name used for bakery or bread products would raise the closest record‑based concern, while use in unrelated goods or services would be farther from the scope shown. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status means the mark no longer protects that wording, but the history suggests that the owner once sought protection for bakery‑related goods, so caution is still warranted if the new use is in that area.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.