Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for @FLOWERS, serial 90764727, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
@FLOWERSSerial 90764727 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Restaurant as a Service, LLC
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 031 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 039 -
Filed Jun 09, 2021
The record shows that @FLOWERS is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it “dead” after the owner, Restaurant as a Service, LLC, failed to file a required Statement of Use following the Notice of Allowance, with the abandonment notice dated Dec 30 2024. The filing covered Class 009 software for mobile apps that let users order, purchase, track and receive flowers, floral arrangements, plants and gifts; Class 031 live flowers, live floral arrangements and living plants; Class 035 online ordering, marketing and franchise services related to those floral products; and Class 039 flower delivery. A similar name used in any of those digital‑ordering, marketing or delivery contexts would create the closest record‑based concern, because the goods and services are specifically listed. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word “flowers” in unrelated fields. No opposition, cancellation or court activity appears in the history, so there are no visible enforcement signals. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable floral‑ordering or delivery service.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.