Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for OPENPODS, serial 90765217, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
OPENPODSSerial 90765217 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: SHOKZ (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Jun 09, 2021
The record shows a pending application for the mark OPENPODS owned by SHOKZ (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD., filed on June 9, 2021 and currently listed as “suspended” with the latest status update on June 1, 2026 indicating the suspension check was completed and the case remains suspended; no registration has been issued. The application covers Class 009 goods such as batteries, earphones, headphones, megaphones, microphones, spectacles, chargers, electronic memories, lithium‑ion batteries, memory modules, personal headphones, smart glasses, virtual‑reality headsets, wireless speakers and MP3 players. A similar name used for any of those electronic or audio‑related products would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside that scope are farther from the specific goods listed. Because the mark is not yet registered, the record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “OPENPODS.” The prosecution history shows repeated suspension checks but no move to the Supplemental Register, so the application remains on the Principal track. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market comparable electronic audio devices under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.