Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for S R SHEER RADIANCE BECAUSE TRUE BEAUTY GLOWS!, serial 90794231, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
S R SHEER RADIANCE BECAUSE TRUE BEAUTY GLOWS!Serial 90794231 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Christian, Clara M
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Filed Jun 24, 2021
The record shows that the mark “S R SHEER RADIANCE BECAUSE TRUE BEAUTY GLOWS!” is dead, having been abandoned because the applicant failed to respond to an Office action. The owner listed is Clara M. Christian, a Georgia limited liability company. The mark was applied for on June 24, 2021 and covers medical and beauty services under class 044, specifically beauty consultation services in the selection and use of cosmetics, fragrances, beauty aids, personal care products, and bath, body and beauty products. The closest concern for a similar name would arise in those same beauty‑related services. The record does not give the mark control over all uses of the wording; it is limited to the goods and services listed. The prosecution history shows a non‑final action in March and July 2022, a voluntary amendment in July 2021, and ultimately abandonment in January 2023. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status means the mark is no longer enforceable, but the specific beauty‑service scope remains a potential point of concern if the new name is used in the same field.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.