Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ECOTONE, serial 90876596, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ECOTONESerial 90876596 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Ecotone Analytics GBC
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Filed Aug 11, 2021
Registered Feb 21, 2023
The record shows that ECOTONE is a live, Principal Register service mark owned by Ecotone Analytics GBC, a Minnesota corporation, and it was registered on February 21 2023 after filing on August 11 2021. The registration covers Class 035 services—strategic business planning, brand‑value positioning, policymaking and philanthropy consulting—and Class 036 services—strategic financial advisory, return‑on‑investment and fund‑management consulting, both used in commerce since May 4 2015. Because the goods and services are limited to high‑level business and financial strategy work, a similar name used in unrelated fields such as consumer products, software or retail would be farther from the scope shown here, though the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word “ECOTONE.” The prosecution history shows the application proceeded through examination, received a non‑final office action in January 2022, was approved for publication, and ultimately entered the Principal Register, indicating no supplemental‑register step. The latest meaningful event is the registration confirmation on February 21 2023, and the supplied history contains no opposition, cancellation or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to offer comparable strategic consulting services under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.