Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for NOBSACTIVE, serial 90977849, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
NOBSACTIVESerial 90977849 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Thore Unlimited, LLC
Class 021 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 028 -
Filed Mar 24, 2021
The record shows that the “NOBSACTIVE” application is abandoned, with the last status change on July 15 2024 when the USPTO issued an abandonment notice because no Statement of Use was filed after the Notice of Allowance; the owner listed is Thore Unlimited, LLC, a North Carolina limited‑liability company. The filing covered Class 021 water bottles sold empty, Class 025 athletic apparel such as pants, shirts, shorts, T‑shirts and tank tops, and Class 028 fitness items like dumbbells and jump ropes, so a later use of a similar name on any of those products would be the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give Thore Unlimited control over every possible use of the word “NOBSACTIVE,” only over the goods expressly listed. Because the application was on the Principal Register and never moved to the Supplemental Register, there is no supplemental‑register sequence to note. The prosecution history shows no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so the supplied history contains no visible enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a similar name for water bottles, athletic wear or fitness equipment.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.