Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for THE MARK CONSISTS OF LITERAL ELEMENTS EVOKE CONSCIOUSNESS. THE APPLICANT IS NOT CLAIMING COLOR AS A FEATURE OF THE MARK. THE MARK CONSISTS OF A PICTURE OF A PERSON IN A SEATED YOGA POSITION ON A BED OF LOTUS SHAPED FLOWERS. THE LOTUS SHAPED FLOWERS TRAVEL FROM THE RIGHT SHOULDER, UNDERNEATH THE OUTLINED PERSON, AND UP TO THE LEFT SHOULDER. THIS PICTURE OF THE OUTLINED PERSON IS POSITIONED WITHIN THE INNER CIRCLE OF A CIRCULAR LOTUS FLOWER. OUTSIDE THE LOTUS FLOWER ARE TWO LAYERS OF INTERTWINED HEARTS. THE FIRST SET OF HEARTS ARE PARTIALLY BEHIND THE INNER CIRCLE OF THE LOTUS. THE OUTER INTERTWINED LAYERS OF HEARTS HAVE A MORE DEFINED HEART SHAPE THAN THE FIRST LAYER THAT IS DIRECTLY ATTACHED TO THE INNER CIRCLE OF THE LOTUS FLOWER., serial 97078189, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
Trademark Status Report
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Serial 97078189 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Carol A. Goss Revocable Trust u/a/d 10/17/2018
Class 010 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed
The record shows the application is dead – it was refused and voided because it never met the minimum filing‑date requirements, with the last status update on Nov 4 2021; the owner listed is Carol A. Goss Revocable Trust u/a/d 10/17/2018. The goods covered are “fashion face masks being sanitary masks for protection against viral infection” (class 010) and “athletic apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats and caps, athletic uniforms” (class 025). A similar name would raise the closest concern if used for any of those mask or athletic‑clothing products, since the record’s protection is limited to those descriptions and does not extend to unrelated goods or services. The filing was on the Principal Register but never progressed beyond the initial entry, so there is no supplemental‑register nuance to note. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a comparable name for masks or athletic wear.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.