Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FASHION LEADER BEAUTY LEADER, serial 97122420, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FASHION LEADER BEAUTY LEADERSerial 97122420 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Sanghee Ahn
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed Nov 12, 2021
The record shows that the mark “FASHION LEADER BEAUTY LEADER” is dead; it was abandoned on July 15 2024 because the owner, Sanghee Ahn, did not file a Statement of Use or Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance. The mark was never registered and therefore does not give the owner control over every use of those words. The application covered paper labels and printed business cards (class 016) and a range of clothing items such as socks, underwear, tops, bottoms, shirts, dresses, pants, shorts, skirts, sweaters, sweatshirts, coats, jackets, hats, and gloves (class 025). A similar name would raise the closest concern in those specific goods. The prosecution history shows a standard sequence: the application was approved for publication, published for opposition, received a Notice of Allowance, and the applicant requested and received a first Statement of Use extension. No oppositions, cancellations, or court actions appear in the supplied history, so the record shows no visible enforcement activity. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status means the mark no longer protects the owner, but the goods listed still represent the narrow scope of the original application, so use of the same wording in those categories could still be risky.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.