Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SPARKLE GIRL GROOVE, serial 97203696, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SPARKLE GIRL GROOVESerial 97203696 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Jefferson, Charlotte
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Jan 05, 2022
The record shows that “SPARKLE GIRL GROOVE” is an abandoned service‑mark application owned by Charlotte Jefferson, filed on Jan 5 2022 and marked dead on Apr 19 2023 after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action. The application covered on‑line retail store services featuring cosmetics such as lip gloss, lipstick and makeup palettes, stationery like journals and pens, books, and apparel such as shirts, pants and hoodies (class 035), as well as dance instruction, general dance education and classes in affirmations and crafts (class 041). Because the goods and services are fairly specific, a similar name used for cosmetics, apparel, stationery or dance‑related instruction would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated fields would be farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Sparkle Girl Groove.” The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice and status change on Apr 19 2023; no further maintenance dates are listed. The prosecution history shows only the non‑final action and the abandonment, and there are no visible enforcement actions such as oppositions or cancellations. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a mark in the same product or service categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.