Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PANERALUX, serial 97211823, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PANERALUXSerial 97211823 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: NINGBO PANERA LIGHTING CO.,LTD.
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed Jan 10, 2022
Registered Nov 21, 2023
The record shows that PANERALUX is a live, Principal Register service mark owned by NINGBO PANERA LIGHTING CO.,LTD., a limited company organized in China, and it was registered on November 21 2023 after filing on January 10 2022. The registration covers a very broad set of goods and services in International Class 035, essentially advertising and business services that include import‑export agency work, invoicing, procurement of items such as optical character readers, integrated circuit cards, humanoid robots, downloadable taxi‑booking apps, data‑processing equipment, smart glasses, smartphones, protective films, e‑readers, microphones, headphones, lighting and photographic equipment, and related measurement tools. Because the claim is limited to those listed items, the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word “PANERALUX,” but a similar name used in the same or closely related technology‑oriented business services would raise the closest concern. The latest status event is the registration date of November 21 2023, and the supplied history contains no visible enforcement actions such as oppositions or cancellations. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a comparable name in the same class of tech‑related business services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.