Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for FLEURS DE VILLES MUSEUM OF FLOWERS, serial 97221693, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FLEURS DE VILLES MUSEUM OF FLOWERS
Serial 97221693 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused

Owner: Fleurs de Villes Inc.
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Jan 15, 2022

The record shows the application for “FLEURS DE VILLES MUSEUM OF FLOWERS” is dead – it was abandoned on Jan 5 2026 because the owner never filed a required Statement of Use after the Notice of Allowance, and no extension was granted after that date. The owner listed is Fleurs de Villes Inc., a Canadian corporation. The filing covered Class 035 services (online trade‑show exhibitions, organization of commercial art and flower exhibitions, fairs and promotional events) and Class 041 services (art exhibition services, flower‑arrangement instruction, cultural or educational exhibitions, and online art exhibitions). A similar name would raise the closest concern if used for any of those advertising, event‑organizing or educational activities involving flowers or art; it does not automatically control unrelated goods or services. Because the mark was on the Principal Register and never moved to the Supplemental Register, the prosecution history simply reflects the standard notice‑of‑allowance and subsequent failure to submit use evidence, not a supplemental‑register amendment. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on Jan 5 2026, and the record contains no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan a comparable name in the same exhibition‑or‑education space, but the abandonment means the USPTO no longer grants any exclusive rights for this wording.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search