Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ELSA SCIENCE, serial 97427447, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ELSA SCIENCESerial 97427447 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Elsa Science AB
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Filed May 25, 2022
Registered Jun 25, 2024
The record shows that ELSA SCIENCE is a live, Principal Register trademark owned by Elsa Science AB, a Swedish aktiebolag, and it was officially registered on June 25, 2024. The registration covers three classes: Class 009 for downloadable and mobile‑device software that tracks, manages and provides information about chronic medical diseases; Class 042 for medical and scientific research, computer programming, and online non‑downloadable software related to chronic disease information and treatment; and Class 044 for providing medical information, health consultancy and advisory services concerning chronic and degenerative diseases. A similar name used in any of those health‑focused software, research or consulting contexts would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those areas are farther from the listed scope but not automatically free of risk. The prosecution history shows a normal examination path with a Notice of Allowance in October 2023, a Statement of Use accepted in May 2024, and the final registration in June 2024; there is no indication of opposition or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name that touches medical software or chronic‑disease services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.