Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for FLORES ACTIVE, serial 97534588, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FLORES ACTIVE
Serial 97534588 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused

Owner: Flores y Cia S.A.
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed Aug 04, 2022

The record shows that “FLORES ACTIVE” is an abandoned application, filed by Flores y Cia S.A. of Chile on August 4 2022, and the USPTO issued an abandonment notice on May 18 2023 after the applicant failed to respond to a non‑final office action. The mark was sought on the Principal Register for clothing (class 025) – including bras, leggings, lingerie, pajamas, panties, shirts, shorts, slippers, socks, swimwear, underwear, sports bras, T‑shirts, tops and jackets – and for online wholesale and retail store services featuring clothing, swimwear, jewelry, beauty products, lotions, make‑up, creams, hair accessories and perfumes (class 035). A similar name used in connection with any of those apparel items or related retail services would raise the closest record‑based concern, but the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Flores” or “Active.” The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on May 18 2023, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a comparable name for clothing or related retail services.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search