Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for IDCHECK BY CO-OP, serial 97637503, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
IDCHECK BY CO-OP
Serial 97637503 · Supplemental Register
Live · Registered

Owner: CU Cooperative Systems, Inc.
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Oct 18, 2022
Registered Oct 08, 2024

The record shows that “IDCHECK BY CO‑OP” is a live, registered Supplemental Register service mark owned by CU Cooperative Systems, Inc., a California cooperative corporation. It covers “providing online non‑downloadable computer software for identity verification or authentication; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for identity verification or authentication” in International Class 042, with a first use date of April 19 2024. Because the registration is limited to those identity‑verification software services, a similar name used for unrelated goods—say, clothing or food—would be farther from the scope shown here, while a name used for competing identity‑verification tools would be the closest area of concern. The prosecution history is empty, indicating the USPTO accepted the application directly to the Supplemental Register without a descriptiveness refusal noted. The most recent status event is the registration date of October 8 2024, and no enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable name in the same software‑as‑a‑service identity‑verification space.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search