Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for .META, serial 97643790, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
.METASerial 97643790 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Ferdous, Habib Md Shakil
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Oct 22, 2022
The record shows that the mark “.META” is dead, having been abandoned because the applicant failed to respond to an Office action. The owner listed is Habib Md Shakil Ferdous, an individual organized in New York. The mark was filed on October 22, 2022 under an intent‑to‑use basis and covered services in class 042 (scientific and technology services such as virtual testing, computer programming for virtual worlds, and online community services in the metaverse, web3, and blockchain) and class 045 (legal and personal services related to domain name registration, monitoring, and consultancy). A similar name would raise the closest concern in these areas, especially where the services involve virtual worlds, blockchain, or domain name management. The record does not give control over every use of the wording; it only reflects the specific services listed. The prosecution history shows a non‑final action in September 2023 and the abandonment notice in January 2024, with no enforcement actions recorded. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status means the mark is no longer enforceable, but the specific services listed still represent a potential area of concern if the new use overlaps those services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.