Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FREE TO BE ME IT'S ALL IN THE NAME SISTER SOUL PANTS IT'S JUST ME., serial 97675785, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FREE TO BE ME IT'S ALL IN THE NAME SISTER SOUL PANTS IT'S JUST ME.Serial 97675785 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Palmer, Patricia A
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed Nov 14, 2022
The record shows that the mark “FREE TO BE ME IT'S ALL IN THE NAME SISTER SOUL PANTS IT'S JUST ME.” is dead, having been abandoned because the applicant failed to respond to an Office action. The owner listed is Patricia A. Palmer, an individual, and the mark was filed on November 14, 2022 under an intent‑to‑use basis for class 025, which covers clothing such as shirts, socks, undergarments, hoodies, sweatpants, and related accessories. Because the mark is no longer active, it does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, but the specific description of apparel means that a new mark that is very similar and also applied to clothing could raise the closest concern. The prosecution history shows the mark was assigned to an examiner and a non‑final action was issued in August 2023, but the applicant did not respond, leading to abandonment in December 2023. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the main risk is that the abandoned mark still indicates that the wording has been examined and found problematic for clothing, so a new application in that class could face scrutiny.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.