Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for HOMO INSILICUS, serial 97686733, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
HOMO INSILICUSSerial 97686733 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Weave Platform, Inc.
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Nov 21, 2022
The record shows that the application for “HOMO INSILICUS” is dead; it was abandoned on Dec 23 2024 because no Statement of Use was filed after the Notice of Allowance was issued, and the owner listed is Weave Platform, Inc., a Delaware corporation. The filing covered Class 042 services – a platform‑as‑a‑service that lets researchers and scientists collect, edit, organize, modify, transmit, store, review and share data and information, especially in biomedicine, health, medicine, research and pharmaceuticals. A later use of the same or a similar name in the same scientific‑technology software space would be the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated fields would be farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give Weave Platform control over every possible use of the words “HOMO INSILICUS.” No supplemental‑register activity appears; the prosecution history simply moves from approval for publication to abandonment after the required use filing was missed. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on Dec 23 2024, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a similar name for a scientific‑technology platform, because the existing filing targets that exact niche.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.