Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FLORES RECORDS, serial 97754829, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FLORES RECORDSSerial 97754829 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Flores, Antonio
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Jan 14, 2023
The record shows that “FLORES RECORDS” is an abandoned service‑mark application, filed by Antonio Flores as an individual on Jan 14 2023, and the USPTO issued an abandonment notice on Dec 10 2025 after the applicant failed to respond to a non‑final office action. The only goods and services listed are in International Class 041: “recording and production of musical sound recordings and videos; music and record production; entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring non‑downloadable musical performances, non‑downloadable musical videos, photographs, and information on artists in the field of music.” A similar name would raise the closest concern if used for any of those music‑related production or entertainment services, because the record’s scope is limited to that description. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Flores” or “Records” in other industries. No supplemental‑register filing appears, and the prosecution history simply reflects the office action and subsequent abandonment. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so there are no visible enforcement signals. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to offer comparable music‑production or entertainment services under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.