Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for XCELL, serial 97830709, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
XCELLSerial 97830709 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Sandvik Mining and Construction Australia (Production/Supply) Pty Ltd
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 037 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Mar 09, 2023
Registered Sep 02, 2025
The record shows that the mark “XCELL” is live and registered on the Principal Register under serial 97830709, owned by Sandvik Mining and Construction Australia (Production/Supply) Pty Ltd. The registration covers a broad range of technical and scientific goods and services, including wireless convergence sensors, laser and vibration sensors, and related installation, maintenance, and training services for mining, construction, and rock processing. A similar name would raise the closest concern in those same technical and mining‑related fields, especially where sensors or monitoring systems are involved. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “XCELL” in unrelated industries. The most recent event is the registration confirmation on September 2, 2025, with no further maintenance or enforcement actions listed. Because no oppositions or cancellations appear, the supplied history shows no visible enforcement activity. For anyone looking to use a similar name, the risk is that in mining or sensor‑related contexts the mark could be considered too close to this registered mark.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.