Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for THOT PATENT, serial 97854935, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
THOT PATENTSerial 97854935 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Norman B. Thot
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Mar 24, 2023
Registered Apr 16, 2024
The record shows a live, registered Principal Register service mark owned by individual Norman B. Thot, with the registration date of April 16 2024 and a notice of updated registration confirmation emailed on April 29 2025. The mark covers “Patent agent services; patent watch services; patent and industrial property consultation; legal services relating to granting of patents; licensing of patents; licensing of design patents; intellectual property consultancy services in the field of patents and patent applications; trademark agent services; legal services, namely, trademark maintenance service; providing assistance in the prosecution of trademark applications; legal services relating to issuing of trademark registrations; legal services, namely, preparation of applications for trademark registration; attorney services, namely, representation of clients in patent, design patents and federal trademark matters; intellectual property …” in International Class 045. A similar name used for any of those patent‑ or trademark‑related legal services would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside that narrow legal‑services field are farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “THOT PATENT.” No oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear in the history, so the supplied history shows no visible enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to offer comparable patent or trademark legal services under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.