Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for GRUPPO VAVA, serial 97861877, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
GRUPPO VAVASerial 97861877 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: ADG VANGUARD IP LLC
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed Mar 28, 2023
The record shows that the application for “GRUPPO VAVA” is dead, having been abandoned on April 17 2024 after the applicant failed to satisfy the Office action, and the owner listed is ADG VANGUARD IP LLC, a Delaware limited‑liability company. The filing covered clothing in class 025, specifically items such as boots, dresses, gloves, hats, hoodies, shirts, shoes, shorts, trousers, blouses, business wear (suits, jackets, blazers, skirts, dresses and footwear), polo shirts, running shoes, sweat pants, sweat shirts, T‑shirts, tracksuits, waist belts, jackets for men, women and children, and sports jerseys, expressly excluding lingerie, bras, underwear or intimate apparel. Because the record is limited to those apparel goods, a similar name used for unrelated products would be farther from the scope shown here, though the wording itself is not cleared for all uses. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice mailed on April 18 2024, and the prosecution history contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so no enforcement activity is visible. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market clothing under a comparable name, since the abandoned application still signals that the USPTO found issues with the mark in that category.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.