Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ONEPLUS PEAK, serial 97915427, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ONEPLUS PEAKSerial 97915427 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed May 01, 2023
Registered Jul 09, 2024
The record shows that ONEPLUS PEAK is a live, Principal Register trademark owned by OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited company, and it was officially registered on July 9 2024 after publication for opposition on April 23 2024. The registration covers a broad set of Class 009 items, including smartphones, foldable smartphones, smartwatches, tablet computers, interactive touchscreen terminals, downloadable mobile‑phone software for online messaging, protective films, cases, covers, selfie sticks, virtual‑reality headsets, earphones, USB cables, battery chargers, portable power supplies, computer chips, touch screens and related accessories. Because the goods are all electronic devices and accessories, a similar name used on comparable tech products would create the closest record‑based concern, while use on unrelated categories would be farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “ONEPLUS” or “PEAK.” The latest meaningful event is the notice of registration confirmation emailed on July 9 2024, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name in the same electronic‑device space.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.