Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ONEPLUS WING, serial 97915452, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ONEPLUS WINGSerial 97915452 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed May 01, 2023
Registered Jul 09, 2024
The record shows that ONEPLUS WING is a live, Principal Register trademark owned by OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited company, and it was registered on July 9 2024 after filing on May 1 2023. The registration covers a broad set of Class 009 items, including smartphones, foldable smartphones, tablets, smartwatches, interactive touchscreen terminals, downloadable mobile‑phone software for online messaging, protective films, cases, covers, selfie sticks, earphones, virtual‑reality headsets, USB cables, battery chargers, portable power supplies, computer chips, touch screens and related accessories. Because the goods are all electronic devices and related accessories, a similar name used for any of those products would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside this technology sphere would be farther from the listed scope. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “ONEPLUS WING.” The latest meaningful event is the Notice of Registration Confirmation and entry on the Principal Register on July 9 2024; no enforcement actions appear in the history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to brand electronic hardware or accessories with a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.