Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PARQUETS ALEXANDRA, serial 97925388, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PARQUETS ALEXANDRASerial 97925388 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: BOA-FRANC, G.P.
Class 019 -
Filed May 08, 2023
The record shows that “PARQUETS ALEXANDRA” is a dead application that was abandoned on April 28, 2026 because the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, and the owner listed is BOA‑FRANC, G.P., a Canadian corporation. The filing covered only class 019, specifically hardwood flooring and non‑metal accessories for constructing hardwood floors such as wood floor moldings, stair nosings, reducers, thresholds and quarter‑round moldings. A similar name used for any of those flooring‑related products would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated categories would be farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “PARQUETS” or “ALEXANDRA.” The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice and abandonment entry on April 28, 2026; no further maintenance or renewal dates are provided. The prosecution history contains only routine office‑action correspondence and suspension inquiries, and the supplied history shows no enforcement actions such as oppositions or cancellations. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to market hardwood‑flooring items under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.