Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for KOICHI, serial 98004570, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
KOICHISerial 98004570 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: HONG KONG KOICHI TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LIMITED
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed May 19, 2023
The record shows that the application for the service mark KOICHI, filed by HONG KONG KOICHI TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LIMITED, is dead after being abandoned on May 31 2024 because the applicant failed to respond to an Office action; there is no active registration. The goods and services listed are limited to Class 35 advertising and business services, specifically online retail consignment stores featuring household appliances, online retail department‑store services, and online retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others. A similar name used in the same online retail or advertising context would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those e‑commerce services are farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word KOICHI in any industry. The prosecution history shows a non‑final action issued in February 2024 followed by an abandonment notice and final abandonment in May 2024, which is the most recent status event. No oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable online retail or advertising service, because the abandoned application still signals that the USPTO considered the mark for those specific e‑commerce services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.