Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for APOLLO GPT, serial 98019260, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
APOLLO GPTSerial 98019260 · Principal Register
Dead · Withdrawn
Owner: FinTech Studios, Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed May 30, 2023
The record shows that the mark “APOLLO GPT” is dead, having been abandoned after publication because the applicant, FinTech Studios, Inc., filed an express abandonment. The mark was filed on May 30 2023 and published for opposition on November 7 2023, with the abandonment status recorded on January 31 2024. The goods and services listed in classes 009 and 042 cover downloadable computer software and computer services that provide search and analytics using generative artificial intelligence, large language models, and machine learning for business, financial, legal, regulatory, and compliance data. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the same technology‑focused software and services area, especially where the same AI‑based search and analytics functions are offered. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “Apollo” or “GPT” in unrelated contexts. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status means there is no active registration to oppose, but the specific AI‑search services listed remain a potential point of concern if the new use is very close to those goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.