Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for GPT COLLABORATIVE VIRTUAL CARE, serial 98027273, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
GPT COLLABORATIVE VIRTUAL CARESerial 98027273 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: ANDORHEALTH, LLC
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Jun 05, 2023
The record shows that the mark “GPT COLLABORATIVE VIRTUAL CARE” is dead, having been abandoned because the applicant failed to respond or filed a late response to an Office action. The owner listed is ANDORHEALTH, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. The mark covered a wide range of goods and services in classes 009 and 042, including electronic medical monitoring equipment, computer hardware and software for health data collection, and AI‑driven remote patient monitoring services. A similar name would raise the closest concern in those same areas of medical technology and software services. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording; it only shows rights within the specified goods and services. No enforcement activity—such as oppositions or cancellations—is visible in the supplied history. The last significant event was the abandonment notice on January 12, 2026. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status reduces the risk of conflict, but the specific medical technology scope remains a potential concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.