Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ONE, serial 98065036, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ONESerial 98065036 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: SmartONE Solutions Inc.
Class 037 -
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Jun 29, 2023
Registered Jul 16, 2024
The record shows a live, Principal Register registration for the mark ONE owned by SmartONE Solutions Inc., a Canadian corporation, and it was officially registered on July 16 2024 after publication for opposition on April 30 2024. The registration covers advisory, design and networking services tied to building interiors and exteriors, plus telecommunications and software‑as‑a‑service offerings that help patrons in buildings and communities connect for environmental, safety, security, internet and other daily‑life needs, across classes 037, 038 and 042. Because the goods and services focus on building‑related networking and related tech, a similar name used in those same areas would present the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside that niche are farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word ONE. The prosecution history shows an examiner’s amendment on March 25 2024 that led to approval for principal registration, but the mark now sits on the Principal Register. The supplied history contains no opposition, cancellation or court activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable name in building‑networking or related tech services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.