Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for CLOSE FANS, serial 98075142, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
CLOSE FANSSerial 98075142 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: CLOSE FANS TECNOLOGIA LTDA
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Jul 07, 2023
The record shows that “CLOSE FANS” is an abandoned Principal Register application (status dead) owned by CLOSE FANS TECNOLOGIA LTDA, a Brazilian limited‑liability company; the abandonment was entered on July 20 2026 after the applicant failed to file a required Statement of Use. The filing covers a broad set of services in classes 035 (advertising and business consulting), 038 (digital telecommunications and video broadcasting), 041 (content‑creation training and adult‑content entertainment portals), and 042 (application‑hosting, SaaS, data storage and related tech consulting), so a similar name used in any of those advertising, telecom, adult‑content or technology contexts would raise the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “close fans” outside those listed services. Because the application was on the Principal Register, there is no Supplemental Register sequence to note. The most recent meaningful event is the July 20 2026 abandonment notice, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a similar name in the same advertising, telecom, adult‑content or tech service areas.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.