Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for IDC INTEGRATED DYNAMIC CONTROL, serial 98082920, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
IDC INTEGRATED DYNAMIC CONTROLSerial 98082920 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Safelink Systems, Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Jul 13, 2023
Registered Nov 26, 2024
The record shows a live, Principal Register registration for “IDC INTEGRATED DYNAMIC CONTROL” owned by Safelink Systems, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, with a registration date of November 26 2024; the most recent status event is the notice of registration confirmation emailed on that same day. The mark covers home and office automation systems that include computer hardware, wireless and wired controllers, and downloadable software for automating HVAC, indoor air quality, floor heating and cooling, using renewable energy sources such as solar and heat pumps, all filed under International Class 009. A similar name would raise the closest record‑based concern if used for any of those automation products or related software, because the listed goods define the scope of protection. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “integrated dynamic control” in unrelated fields. The prosecution history shows an initial final refusal in July 2024 that was later overcome, leading to approval for publication and eventual registration on the Principal Register, but it does not imply any special limitation beyond what is listed. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market comparable automation hardware or software under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.