Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for S VIRTUAL HOME TOUR 360, serial 98153427, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
S VIRTUAL HOME TOUR 360Serial 98153427 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: SAHIBlNDEN BILGl TEKNoLoJILER| PAZARLAMA VE TiCARET ANONiM SIRKETI
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Aug 28, 2023
The record shows that “S VIRTUAL HOME TOUR 360” is currently pending under examination on the Principal Register, owned by SAHIBlNDEN BILGl TEKNoLoJILER| PAZARLAMA VE TiCARET ANONiM SIRKETI, a Turkish anonim sirketi. The mark covers a wide range of electrical and scientific apparatus (class 009) and a broad array of advertising, business, and scientific‑technology services (classes 035 and 042). A similar name would raise the closest concern for use in any of those goods or services, especially in the technology or advertising sectors. The record does not give the mark control over every use of the wording, only over the specific goods and services listed. The prosecution history shows a typical examination sequence with a withdrawal and approval for publication, but no indication that the mark is on the Supplemental Register. The latest status event is the withdrawal of a previous allowance count on April 3, 2025, and no enforcement actions are visible. For someone considering a similar name, the presence of this pending mark in these classes suggests a meaningful risk of conflict if the name is used for comparable technology or advertising services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.