Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PULP, serial 98178057, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PULPSerial 98178057 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Pulp Internet Corporation
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Sep 13, 2023
The record shows that the mark PULP is dead – it was abandoned on Jan 23 2025 after the applicant failed to respond to a final refusal, and the owner listed is Pulp Internet Corporation, a Delaware corporation. The application covered class 042 services, specifically computer‑related offerings such as providing search‑engine tools for customized web pages and data feeds, design and development of hardware and software, and hosting and application‑service provider functions. A similar name would raise the closest record‑based concern if used for comparable scientific or technology services, because that is the exact scope the USPTO examined. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word “PULP” in unrelated fields. This was a principal‑register filing that never moved to the Supplemental Register; the prosecution history simply reflects a non‑final office action, a final refusal, and the subsequent abandonment notice. No oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern for anyone planning a tech‑service brand that resembles “PULP.”
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.